31.58% Win Rate

FOUNDATION FUTURISTIC TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD

6 wins / 19 tenders
Reg Year 1999
Delhi

Company Overview

Total Bids

19

Qualified: 17
Q Rate: 89.47%

Contract Value

₹4.15 Cr

Avg Value: ₹21.20 Lakh
High Value: 0

L1 Bids

6

Win Value: ₹1.27 Cr
Win Rate: 32%

Historical Bids (Since 2018)

146

Qualified: 119
L1 Bids: 68

Participated Tenders

DIGITAL FORENSIC PLATFORM SOFTWARE

₹8.00 Lakh
Goods
Qty: 1
Qualified
Rank: L2
+74.9% vs L1
Price is 74.9% higher than the winner (L1)
Top Competitors:
PELORUS TECHNOLOGIES (L1)
AALFA ENETWORK PRIVA (L3)
+1 more
Bid Deadline: March 11, 2025

Forensic Imaging and write blocking Device,Forensic Imaging and write blocking Device

₹13.27 Lakh
Goods
Qty: 2
Qualified
Rank: L2
+2.4% vs L1
Price is 2.4% higher than the winner (L1)
Top Competitors:
Cyint Technologies (L1)
Krypton Systems   Un (L3)
+3 more
Bid Deadline: February 28, 2025

OpenText Tableau Ultrakit SATA/IDE Write Blocker

₹89K
Goods
Qty: 2
Qualified
Rank: L2
+111.1% vs L1
Price is 111.1% higher than the winner (L1)
Top Competitors:
Cyint Technologies (L1)
AKS INFORMATION TECH (L3)
Bid Deadline: February 26, 2025

DATA RECOVERY TOOLS

₹31.80 Lakh
Goods
Qty: 1
Winner (L1)
Won by 1.0% margin compared to L2 (₹33K)
Top Competitors:
AALFA ENETWORK PRIVA (L2)
JAYCEETECH SOFTWARES (L3)
Bid Deadline: February 21, 2025

Forensic Imaging and write blocking Device

₹9.99 Lakh
Goods
Qty: 1
Disqualified
Top Competitors:
ALIBI GLOBAL PRIVATE (L1)
Bid Deadline: February 20, 2025

Forensic Imaging and write blocking Device

₹2.30 Lakh
Goods
Qty: 1
Winner (L1)
Won by 3.1% margin compared to L2 (₹10K)
Top Competitors:
Cyint Technologies (L2)
CYBER INTELLIGENCE G (L3)
+2 more
Bid Deadline: January 1, 2025

Forensic Imaging and write blocking Device

₹2.68 Lakh
Goods
Qty: 1
Winner (L1)
Won by 19.8% margin compared to L2 (₹56K)
Top Competitors:
JAYCEETECH SOFTWARES (L2)
CYBER INTELLIGENCE G (L3)
Bid Deadline: December 30, 2024

Hiring of Agency for IT Projects- Milestone basis

₹12.49 Lakh
Service
Qty: 1
Qualified
Rank: L2
+0.2% vs L1
Price is 0.2% higher than the winner (L1)
Top Competitors:
JAYCEETECH SOFTWARES (L1)
AALFA ENETWORK PRIVA (L3)
Bid Deadline: December 10, 2024

DIGITAL FORENSIC PLATFORM SOFTWARE

₹50.77 Lakh
Goods
Qty: 10
Winner (L1)
Won by 62.3% margin compared to L2 (₹31.64 Lakh)
Top Competitors:
HGM TECHNOLOGIES PRI (L2)
PELORUS TECHNOLOGIES (L3)
+1 more
Bid Deadline: November 29, 2024

FIS FRS Automation software

₹9.48 Lakh
Goods
Qty: 1
Qualified
Top Competitors:
JAYCEETECH SOFTWARES (L1)
AAA CONFEDERACY   Un (L2)
+1 more
Bid Deadline: October 17, 2024

This report provides a detailed business analysis of Foundation Futuristic Technologies Pvt Ltd, focusing on their performance in government tenders and their competitive positioning within the technology sector. With a portfolio of 144 government tender participations, this analysis provides insights into their bidding performance, tender success patterns, and strategic engagement in India's public procurement landscape.

Executive Summary

Foundation Futuristic Technologies exhibits a strong presence in the government tender landscape. Their financial performance is highlighted by a 46.5% win rate and ₹37.8 Crores in secured government contracts. The company demonstrates a solid technical qualification rate of 81.2%, indicating strong compliance capabilities with public procurement specifications. Foundation Futuristic Technologies's competitive positioning reveals both strengths and weaknesses, offering valuable insights for strategic improvements. The industry sector shows moderate competitive intensity, requiring targeted strategies for sustained success.

Financial Performance

Overall Financial Health

Foundation Futuristic Technologies demonstrates stable financial performance with a "Satisfactory" health score of 59.8/100. The analysis considers win rate, contract value, bid efficiency, growth, and consistency. The company's financial health reflects a moderate win rate alongside areas needing improvement, such as contract value growth.

Key highlights:

  • Total contract value: ₹378,877,871 secured from government tenders
  • Average Earnest Money Deposit (EMD): ₹36,432, indicating financial stability
  • Conversion rate: 100.0% conversion of bid value to won contracts

The company's financial metrics indicate strong potential, though strategic adjustments are necessary to capitalize on opportunities for increased revenue and market share. Foundation Futuristic Technologies financial performance is also closely correlated with its key performance indicators (KPIs), like win rate and qualification rate.

Yearly Performance Analysis

A review of the yearly financial performance reveals trends in bid activity, win rates, and contract values:

Fiscal YearBid CountWin CountWin Rate (%)Total Contract Value (₹)
FY 2018-19000.00.0
FY 2019-20000.00.0
FY 2020-212615**57.69**33,750,907
FY 2021-22462350.086,188,314
FY 2022-2333927.27161,161,149
FY 2023-242314**60.87**60,277,227
FY 2024-2516637.537,500,274
The data shows fluctuating **win rates** and contract values across the years. The **financial timeline** indicates a need for strategies to stabilize and enhance **financial performance**.

Bid Distribution and Win Rates

Examining the bid distribution across different price ranges is crucial for refining the bidding strategy. The data indicates that Foundation Futuristic Technologies experiences varied success rates across different bid value ranges:

  • Bids under ₹1,000,000: 57 bids, 0 wins
  • Bids between ₹1,000,000 and ₹5,000,000: 43 bids, 0 wins
  • Bids between ₹5,000,000 and ₹10,000,000: 10 bids, 0 wins
  • Bids between ₹10,000,000 and ₹50,000,000: 4 bids, 0 wins

This analysis underscores the need to adjust pricing strategies to improve win rates in specific bid ranges. Foundation Futuristic Technologies financial performance relies on successfully addressing these disparities.

Competitive Analysis

Key Competitors

Foundation Futuristic Technologies operates in a competitive landscape. The analysis identifies the following as top competitors:

  1. CYINT TECHNOLOGIES
  2. TNS NETWORKING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED.
  3. PELORUS TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
  4. FORENSIC CARE TECHNOLOGIES
  5. PYRAMID CYBER SECURITY & FORENSIC PRIVATE LIMITED

These competitors are evaluated based on encounter count, engagement rate, wins against Foundation Futuristic Technologies, and overall threat level.

Head-to-Head Analysis

A head-to-head analysis reveals strengths and weaknesses against each competitor:

  • CYINT TECHNOLOGIES: High encounter count (41) with a win rate of 46.3%.
  • TNS NETWORKING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED: High encounter count (34) but a 0% win rate.
  • PELORUS TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED: Encounter count (32) and a 28.1% win rate.
  • AKS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED: Tough competitor with a 17.4% win rate

Foundation Futuristic Technologies must develop targeted strategies to improve competitive positioning and win rates against these competitors. Understanding the competitive positioning in forensic tech is crucial for strategic success.

Competitive Advantages & Threats

The analysis reveals both competitive advantages and threats:

  • Competitive Advantages: Efficient bid process with high conversion rate.
  • Competitive Threats: Low win rate in the ₹0-₹1,000,000 range and high threat from competitors like TNS NETWORKING SOLUTIONS.

To maintain a strong competitive positioning in the tech sector, Foundation Futuristic Technologies must leverage its strengths while mitigating threats.

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

  • Strong win rate of 37.5% in the most recent year.
  • Well-diversified client portfolio across multiple departments.

Weaknesses

  • Poor performance in bid ranges: \1000000.0, 1000000.0-5000000.0
  • Weak performance in financial health components: Contract Value, Growth

Opportunities

  • Expand bidding activity with high-value departments: Department of Defence Research & Development
  • Increase participation in underserved bid ranges: 6000000.0, 7000000.0, 8000000.0
  • Capitalize on strong seasonal performance in Q4 (Jan-Mar)

Threats

  • Significant decline in win rate indicating competitive pressure
  • Low success rate in high-value tenders increases financial volatility

Strategic Recommendations

Pricing Strategy Adjustments

Revise pricing strategy for problematic bid ranges to improve competitiveness. The lack of wins in lower bid ranges necessitates a review of pricing models.

Business Development Plans

Develop targeted business development plans for high-value departments such as the Department of Defence Research & Development. Understanding business growth strategy in the tech industry is crucial here.

Resource Allocation

Allocate more resources to bid preparation for mid to high-value tenders. Given the higher contract values, these tenders justify increased investment.

Market Expansion

Create a market expansion strategy targeting new customer segments. Diversifying the client base reduces reliance on existing relationships and improves overall financial stability.

Actionable Strategies

  • Analyze pricing strategies used by high-threat competitors.
  • Review technical qualification criteria where competitors excel.
  • Showcase cost-efficiency advantages in bid responses.

Future Outlook and Next Steps

Foundation Futuristic Technologies has the potential for significant growth. The company should focus on:

  1. Enhancing competitive positioning by addressing weaknesses identified in the SWOT analysis.
  2. Optimizing bidding strategies to improve win rates in all price ranges.
  3. Implementing targeted business development plans to expand into new markets and customer segments.
  4. Continuously monitoring and adapting to the evolving government tender landscape.

By focusing on these key areas, Foundation Futuristic Technologies can achieve sustained business growth and solidify its competitive positioning in the technology sector.

Need more insights on this company?