S S ENTERPRISES
Company Overview
Total Bids
1451
Contract Value
₹872.09 Cr
L1 Bids
544
Historical Bids (Since 2018)
9097
Participated Tenders
Truck Mounted Suction Machine (V2)
Manpower Outsourcing Services - Minimum wage - Skilled; ITI; Others,Manpower Outsourcing Services -
Impact Wrench
Municipal solid waste Twin shaft shredder
Manpower Outsourcing Services - Minimum wage - Semi-skilled; High School; Others,Manpower Outsourci
Manpower Outsourcing Services - Minimum wage - Unskilled; Not Required; Others,Manpower Outsourcing
Manpower Outsourcing Services - Minimum wage - Semi-skilled; Not Required; Others
Cotton Pillow
Manpower Outsourcing Services - Minimum wage - Skilled; Secondary School; Admin,Manpower Outsourcin
Ghillie Suit (MHA)
This report provides a detailed business analysis of S S Enterprises, a key player in the government tender landscape. With a strong track record of 9097 tender participations and 2264 L1 wins, this analysis delves into their financial performance, competitive positioning, and strategic opportunities in the government procurement sector.
Executive Summary
S S Enterprises demonstrates a solid presence in the Indian government tender market, evidenced by their 24.9% win rate across 9097 bids. Their ability to secure 2264 L1 positions highlights a competitive bid strategy. This report assesses S S Enterprises' financial performance, competitive landscape, and provides actionable recommendations for future business growth within the government sector.
Financial Performance of S S Enterprises
Key Financial Metrics
- Total Contract Value: S S Enterprises has secured contracts worth ₹9,45,35,98,712.0, demonstrating a 100% conversion rate from bid value to won contracts.
- Average Earnest Money Deposit (EMD): Their average EMD of ₹87,725.76 showcases financial stability to participate in substantial tenders.
- Recent Financial Year (FY 2024-25): The company won 137 out of 760 bids, achieving an 18.03% win rate and securing contracts worth ₹4.78 Billion.
Yearly Financial Performance Table
Year | Bid Count | Win Count | Win Rate (%) | Total Contract Value (₹) | Qualification Rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY 2018-19 | 280 | 51 | 18.21 | 51,046,538.0 | 57.5 |
FY 2019-20 | 2108 | 536 | 25.43 | 411,768,353.0 | 55.17 |
FY 2020-21 | 2172 | 534 | 24.59 | 416,352,215.0 | 53.5 |
FY 2021-22 | 1254 | 314 | 25.04 | 1,145,441,911.0 | 73.13 |
FY 2022-23 | 1074 | 291 | 27.09 | 1,175,771,750.0 | 79.05 |
FY 2023-24 | 1449 | 401 | 27.67 | 1,475,353,585.0 | 82.47 |
FY 2024-25 | 760 | 137 | 18.03 | 4,777,864,360.0 | 55.39 |
Geographical & Sector Focus
- Geographic Presence: Strong presence in Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and Delhi government tenders.
- Department Expertise: Expertise in tenders with Department Of Military Affairs and Department Of Defence.
This focused approach allows S S Enterprises to leverage regional knowledge and established relationships to enhance their competitive positioning.
Competitive Analysis in the Government Tender Sector
Top Competitors
S S Enterprises faces competition from various entities. Key competitors include:
- LANDMARK INFONET PRIVATE LIMITED
- RGS INFOTECH
- SSE FORM HOUSE
Head-to-Head Analysis
S S Enterprises exhibits a 26.1% win rate against SS ENTERPRISES in 371 encounters. Understanding competitor strengths and weaknesses is crucial for refining S S Enterprises' business growth strategy.
Competitive Intensity
The overall competitive intensity in the sectors where S S Enterprises operates is low, presenting opportunities for expansion and increased market share. However, careful navigation of competitive threats is essential.
SWOT Analysis for S S Enterprises
Strengths
- Diversified Client Portfolio: Engages with multiple government departments, mitigating risk.
- High Qualification Rate: Technical qualification rate of 64.5% demonstrates compliance with tender requirements.
Weaknesses
- Lower Win Rate: A win rate of 18.03% indicates potential challenges in competitive bidding.
- Performance Discrepancies: Weak performance in specific bid ranges suggests pricing or strategic misalignments.
Opportunities
- Underserved Bid Ranges: Expanding participation in specific underserved bid ranges can increase win potential.
- Category Expansion: Targeting categories with favorable competitive dynamics can drive growth.
Threats
- Competitive Pressure: Declining win rate suggests increasing competition.
- High-Value Tender Success: Low success rates in high-value tenders can impact financial stability.
Strategic Recommendations for Government Tender Success
Based on this business analysis, the following strategic recommendations are proposed to enhance S S Enterprises' competitive positioning and drive business growth:
- Refine Bid Strategy: Implement a more selective bidding approach, focusing on tenders with higher win probabilities.
- Optimize Pricing: Revise pricing strategies for specific bid ranges to improve competitiveness.
- Resource Allocation: Allocate additional resources to bid preparation for mid to high-value tenders.
- Financial Monitoring: Establish a financial performance dashboard to track key metrics like win rates and contract values.
- Expand into High-Potential Categories: Target product/service categories with favorable competitive dynamics like "Manpower Outsourcing Services - Minimum wage - Skilled;
ITI; Others" identified in the competitive analysis.
Future Outlook and Next Steps
The future outlook for S S Enterprises is positive, contingent upon strategic implementation of the recommendations outlined in this report. Focusing on improving win rates, optimizing financial performance, and leveraging market opportunities will be critical for sustained business growth in the government tender sector. By embracing a proactive approach to competitive analysis and adapting strategies accordingly, S S Enterprises can solidify its position as a leading player in government procurement.
Next Steps:
- Conduct a comprehensive review of current bidding processes.
- Develop a detailed action plan to address identified weaknesses.
- Prioritize the strategic recommendations outlined in this analysis.
- Monitor progress and adapt strategies as needed to maximize success in future government tenders.