sahyog services
Tender Performance & Track Record
Company Overview
Tender Performance
Data for 01 April 2024 to 18 June 2025
Total Bids / Contract Value
Qualified Bids / Q Rate
Total Wins / Win Value
Wins Rate / Q-W Rate
Detailed Performance Analysis
Tender Performance by Ministries
Name
Top Bid Competitors
Companies that frequently compete with you in the same tenders — ranked by their total win value.You applied for 77 bids — KANISHK ENTERPRISES appeared in 51 of them.
SAHYOG SERVICES
SAHYOG SERVICES
Transform Your Tender Process
Join thousands of businesses winning more tenders
Smart Alerts
Get AI-powered tender recommendations
Market Intel
Track competitor bidding patterns
Email Reports
Weekly detailed analytics reports
Download Hub
Export tender data in bulk format
Smart Tracking
Never miss important deadlines
& Much More...
Discover all premium features with your trial
"TenderAI transformed our bidding process. We've increased our win rate by 40% and saved countless hours."
Historical Performance
7-year trend analysis (2018-2025)
Company Overview (1 Apr 2018-31 Mar 2025))
Total Bids
1,192
Contract Value
₹345.91 Cr
L1 Bids
684
Recent Win Rate
51.9%
Performance Analytics
Sahyog Services: Government Tender Performance Analysis
Sahyog Services has demonstrated a robust presence in India's public procurement sector, participating in 1192 government tenders. This comprehensive analysis examines their bidding performance, success patterns, and competitive positioning within the government contract landscape. With a 57.4% success rate, Sahyog Services stands out as a strong contender in securing government projects.
Executive Summary
Sahyog Services exhibits strong performance in the government tender domain. Key highlights include:
- High Win Rate: An impressive 57.4% win rate, significantly above industry averages.
- Strong Financials: Secured ₹3,45,91,24,932.0 in government contract value, demonstrating effective targeting and acquisition of public sector projects.
- Dominant Market Position: Achieved 684 L1 positions, establishing a leading competitive edge.
However, there are areas for improvement, including addressing a 35.2% disqualification rate and optimizing bidding strategies for specific tender value ranges.